>>513328658
>I think there's alot of confusion right now around that case.
There is absolutely no confusion. All these matters were settled decades ago. In the 1990s in nearly all countries. The laws and jurisdictions of websites have been perfectly clear for years. There is almost certainly legislation in the UK detailing exactly why 4chan is not subject to Ofcom's regulations that the UK government put in to promote their tech industry growth in 1996 or some shit.

If you think the US is going to set every layer of the internet and their entire global tech industry on fire at the whims of some London quango you are living in la-la land. Go ahead. Try to apply twitter-level logic to a system whose basic rules as laid down since the 1970s simply do not conform to whatever incorrect pseudo-model you have made for it in your head. Spend as many seconds as you can meditating on the distinction between a computer and a network until the intellectual effort overwhelms you. Your sorry excuse of governance will do no better.