>>514112131
>cool thing about this whole race theory is that everybody has a different deffinition of "white" or "aryan"
you say that all europeans are aryans. are slavs aryans? are gypsies? if they were, why did germans put them all in the camps along with the jews?
aryans are not a real race, they were made up for propaganda purposes and it's up to whoever is in charge at the moment to decide who is and who isn't an aryan
/juda101 rant

These are, at best, total newb assertions. Let's sort this talmudic mess out

>everybody has a different deffinition
no. Germany had one scientific definition and one set of very clear laws. Europeans were defined as enjoying either pure or mixed ancestry from the six races NS race science taught. In plain English, it was basically
>Southern Germanics
>Nordic Germanics
>Balts
>Slavs
>Balkanites
>Hispano-Gallic Celts

>are gypsies?
Both modern and classic race science and NS law says:No.
Which is why they were put in camps.

>aryans are not a real race,
It's a superordinate concept for European and it actually is shorthand for 'Western Aryan', as the eastern Aryans went on to stay in Iran and the Punjab.
Aryans as a loose racial coalition has been 100% vindicated by both archeology and DNA, which are hard sciences in contrast to jewish science.

>it worked phenomenally
>it didn't work phenomenally. they killed a bunch of jews and slavs but it costed them everything. as i said before, they lost the war, the country was participated, most of the leaders died, cities were in ruin and it only started getting better when americans gave you money.
You're not making sense as your mind cannot uncouple the unintended consequences of success from its own merits. Even mainstream historians say
>without the (necessary) invasion of the evil SU, Hitler would have been widely regarded as the greatest statesman of the 20th century because of what he accomplished in such a short amount of time.
Also the holocaust didn't happen.