>>106463931
>It's also a compliment to call the average poster a 105 instead of a 90
idk maybe. but the world is not digital enough, there are too many things that have to be built, more programmers will be needed, and me, i am not going to use any of that shit
>>106464033
>see?
no, i do not. arguing about how the code has to be written might as well be one of the core problems that led us to this disaster. programming is not real engineering, it's not restricted by physics, you can be infinitely retarded in programming and the damn thing will still get into production, and will even work. prove that your judgement is of any value when it comes to code first, because statistically an opinion about how code is supposed to be written is retarded