>>520975502
>What's the point? We are all descendants of the same culture. Europe and her diaspora should be a single nation. Everything else should be a colonial holding.
I could be down with this, as long as we can agree on making English the first language of the White Nation encompassing Europe, Russia, America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and part of South Africa.
I insist on English not because it is better than other European language, for in fact it is inferior as a language for philosophy to German. Rather, English is just the language understood by by far the greatest portion of European and European Diaspora peoples. And its deficiencies, like its lower expressive power for basic concepts in philosophy relative German, can be remedied by hard work to alter how English is used and even constructed in the dialogs of certain topics, since all languages are inherently capable of radical change up to any possible level of expressive power, since all languages have developed to the point of expression power they now achieve from much more primitive ancestral languages through the works of great geniuses who altered how we use our languages, which shows that any system to combine words and phrases under a set of rules which system is powerful enough to constitute a proper natural language can undergo changes to any of its member rules or words or phrases in a potentially infinitely long process of making such changes until any natural language achieves infinite expressive power, or the capacity to express any among all the infinitude of possible concepts.
English has the most expressive power as of languages in the world today, as it is by far the largest language in terms of its vocabulary, and has been the language of more literary geniuses than any other, so even while it is inferior to a few other advanced languages in a few areas, these deficiencies can be remedied with hard work. Combining English's current highest expressive power among world
4chan Search
3 results for "0a793bcc428754473b158706f03326b5"
Britain is a lesser player in the world today in India and in rapid decline
A decade from now, any single Western European country will be considered much less important to the world than India, and in fact, any single Western European country already today is likely either equally important as India, at best, or somewhat less important on the world stage in terms of industry and exports, services keeping global tech infrastructure operating, geostrategic and military influence, and possibly even cultural influence.
Altogether, Western Europe, like the EU, is still a bigger force in the world than India, but much less of a player than China, and in ten years, I don't see how Western Europe as a whole will be anything more than India's equal on the world stage and, as it more likely, it will be India's junior in economic, cultural, geostrategic significance etc.
World Wars I and II were the death of Europe. Europe, after nearly 500 years as center and ruler of the planet, from the time of Henry the Navigator in the 1400s sending expeditions around Africa to trade with India, until 1945 when Europe lost its central and ruling role in the world to America and then, as was inevitable, lost its empire too.
Now Europe is just a medium-sized peninsula on the western edge of Asia. It will never again enjoy the preeminent role it had in the world, but what is more, Europe's importance is in terminal and accelerating decline.
Britain and France were jealous if a reunified Germany more dynamic than they were in the late 1800s and 1900s, to they egged on two giant wars to stymy Germany's rise as the next nation to head Europe and keep Europe atop the world. Of course Germany was belligerent as well, so the blame is not just on the Allied Powers. But all this conflict, born of jealousy for the top spots in Europe, ended Europe's day in the sun.
Now all that Europe can hope for is a slower, less terrible decline into second world status with mediocre economies and increasingly poor populations.
It's a sad fate, and the same fate that likely awaits
Altogether, Western Europe, like the EU, is still a bigger force in the world than India, but much less of a player than China, and in ten years, I don't see how Western Europe as a whole will be anything more than India's equal on the world stage and, as it more likely, it will be India's junior in economic, cultural, geostrategic significance etc.
World Wars I and II were the death of Europe. Europe, after nearly 500 years as center and ruler of the planet, from the time of Henry the Navigator in the 1400s sending expeditions around Africa to trade with India, until 1945 when Europe lost its central and ruling role in the world to America and then, as was inevitable, lost its empire too.
Now Europe is just a medium-sized peninsula on the western edge of Asia. It will never again enjoy the preeminent role it had in the world, but what is more, Europe's importance is in terminal and accelerating decline.
Britain and France were jealous if a reunified Germany more dynamic than they were in the late 1800s and 1900s, to they egged on two giant wars to stymy Germany's rise as the next nation to head Europe and keep Europe atop the world. Of course Germany was belligerent as well, so the blame is not just on the Allied Powers. But all this conflict, born of jealousy for the top spots in Europe, ended Europe's day in the sun.
Now all that Europe can hope for is a slower, less terrible decline into second world status with mediocre economies and increasingly poor populations.
It's a sad fate, and the same fate that likely awaits
The Civilizational States as the Successor to the Nation-State
Nation-states are good, especially for people living within one that functions well and is modernized, but they have a key flaw: size. The old nation-states have populations of less than 100 million people. They were able to dominate the world until the 20th century, when the mega-states of the US and USSR supplanted them, with much greater populations and productive capacities.
But we don't want vast multi-ethnic messes to live in where we can't even get all the major stakeholders, including the general public, on the same page just to solve basic problems in society like building more power plants so that we can have guaranteed electricity in the future. The multiethnic mega-states aren't working, at least not very well.
I think the best option would be to create a Civilization-State encompassing all of the West, plus Japan and South Korea if they wish to be included. This would mean all of Western Europe, much of Eastern Europe, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand would become one country. I wouldn't even be opposed to Russia joining, even though they are only marginally Western (part Western, part Eurasian), if Russia agreed to reforms to combat corruption and Russia's ancient tendency toward autocracy, which stifles creativity and the free exchange of ideas, things that have been key to the West's overwhelming success and dominance.
The world today is divided between major civilizations. China is one, with about a billion and a half people, India is another with slightly more people, Latin America is another but is quite weak geopolitically and economically. However, if all of Latin America wanted to unify in a single country, I would wish them the best and advocate for good relations with them.
Our Western Civilization-State would have all the natural resources it needs, mainly owing to Canada, Australia, and the US, and to a lesser extent Scandinavia, which has a lot of iron ore and some other minerals.
But we don't want vast multi-ethnic messes to live in where we can't even get all the major stakeholders, including the general public, on the same page just to solve basic problems in society like building more power plants so that we can have guaranteed electricity in the future. The multiethnic mega-states aren't working, at least not very well.
I think the best option would be to create a Civilization-State encompassing all of the West, plus Japan and South Korea if they wish to be included. This would mean all of Western Europe, much of Eastern Europe, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand would become one country. I wouldn't even be opposed to Russia joining, even though they are only marginally Western (part Western, part Eurasian), if Russia agreed to reforms to combat corruption and Russia's ancient tendency toward autocracy, which stifles creativity and the free exchange of ideas, things that have been key to the West's overwhelming success and dominance.
The world today is divided between major civilizations. China is one, with about a billion and a half people, India is another with slightly more people, Latin America is another but is quite weak geopolitically and economically. However, if all of Latin America wanted to unify in a single country, I would wish them the best and advocate for good relations with them.
Our Western Civilization-State would have all the natural resources it needs, mainly owing to Canada, Australia, and the US, and to a lesser extent Scandinavia, which has a lot of iron ore and some other minerals.