>>536262192
You too bwo

Why did you skip the character that makes your Arle,Clorinde,Neuv,Chasca usable during the Lunar shilling?

>>536151472
so are 90% of genshin characters, but clanker is cute and useful in a lot of teams

>>535878547
ok good, so it wouldn't be completely retarded to use an elixir on a gilded piece for her then

>>535790257
>sample

since none of you rolled for her i'm sending my ineffa over to your world to do a little cleaning, don't mind her and what she picks up

>gotten 20 intertwined fates rewards from the wheel of tona or whatever its called
>have saved at least 33k gems
This is it. I'm going to roll for Ineffa. Wish me good luck, robobros!

At this point in time, it's kinda dumb to write robotic dialogue for a robot character.
In real life, we've already given computers the ability to speak naturally. It's no longer a futuristic sci-fi concept; it's mundane at this point.
Designing a futuristic bipedal humanoid robot and then making her speak in an emotionless voice and say things like "Cognition module unstable...attempting to refresh." just feels stupid, because present-day technology is already capable of much more natural speech.
Once we begin to see domestic robots hit the market, I'm pretty sure even the first generation of them will have comfortable, smiling faces instead of apathetic robot faces, so even giving a robot an emotionless face is already unrealistic and poor writing.
We're getting closer to commercial humanoid robots and artificial general intelligence with every passing day. This old-fashioned robot dialogue is already extremely dated, but with each passing year it's only going to get more and more dated until it's just laughable.

Please roll for Ineffa