>>516700653
I want the best for them. so I'm tugging that leash on these erroneous utterances of color names. They should pay attention to what we are saying here
4chan Search
7 results for "0b76cea5710b46b655a28a7f879f4c75"
>>516124284
>What other definitions would be valid instead of "white"?
This is not an easy question to answer. Because not everything you imagine can or should become what you imagine it to be. So if it is not correct you might as well not say it. You don’t know yet. You don't know yourself. If you are an upright primate, your name is much like your territory. You can go anywhere but you are still you if you can in-fact be that identity. It is not something entirely determined by biology. The purpose of annunciation is not taxonomy. There is not an equation to tell you what everyones' name is. Genetic sequencing is actually just a comparison to reference populations from an earlier date. Your genes only say, you are you and some one else may be similar, but it does not say what that is or identify it by its true essence. We decide what that is, and we can decide not to decide. So acquiring a name is much like building sovereignty through trust and cooperation, and in many ways the two are indistinguishable. Knowing the complexity of this relationship is understanding its power, because otherwise it would not matter, yet it does. In a way, it is the definition of power, or the way in which that definition arises. Like the resolution of an image; to know its true name is to see it most clearly. And much like the resolution of an image we can describe the dynamics of systems in the same way. You will acquire your name through the interactions and relations brought about by the harmonious resolution of relationships. Identity is identifying that, and therefore identity has a very physical and mechanical occurrence where meaning becomes apparent through the completion of process. In this system the least meaningful outcome is one where nothing happens at all. Identity is the happening happening.
https://x.com/ErectusRex/status/1844176291538628921
>What other definitions would be valid instead of "white"?
This is not an easy question to answer. Because not everything you imagine can or should become what you imagine it to be. So if it is not correct you might as well not say it. You don’t know yet. You don't know yourself. If you are an upright primate, your name is much like your territory. You can go anywhere but you are still you if you can in-fact be that identity. It is not something entirely determined by biology. The purpose of annunciation is not taxonomy. There is not an equation to tell you what everyones' name is. Genetic sequencing is actually just a comparison to reference populations from an earlier date. Your genes only say, you are you and some one else may be similar, but it does not say what that is or identify it by its true essence. We decide what that is, and we can decide not to decide. So acquiring a name is much like building sovereignty through trust and cooperation, and in many ways the two are indistinguishable. Knowing the complexity of this relationship is understanding its power, because otherwise it would not matter, yet it does. In a way, it is the definition of power, or the way in which that definition arises. Like the resolution of an image; to know its true name is to see it most clearly. And much like the resolution of an image we can describe the dynamics of systems in the same way. You will acquire your name through the interactions and relations brought about by the harmonious resolution of relationships. Identity is identifying that, and therefore identity has a very physical and mechanical occurrence where meaning becomes apparent through the completion of process. In this system the least meaningful outcome is one where nothing happens at all. Identity is the happening happening.
https://x.com/ErectusRex/status/1844176291538628921
>>510408797
if names are a tool for pointing with words you are frighting like a monkey
if names are a tool for pointing with words you are frighting like a monkey
>>509438378
>Why don't White Americans call yourselves Celto-Germanic instead of White?
American is already American. you can't be a color
https://x.com/ErectusRex/status/1844176291538628921
>Why don't White Americans call yourselves Celto-Germanic instead of White?
American is already American. you can't be a color
https://x.com/ErectusRex/status/1844176291538628921
>>508334105
>if it can be less racist it should be
>>508333340
>how would you do it?
https://x.com/ErectusRex/status/1844176291538628921
here is the only solution. The problem naturally fixes itself when you correct the error. You don't promote whiteism or proracism or an ism at all. YOU STOP NAMING YOURSELF A COLOR. racism is a semantical error and so is naming yourself a color.
So the solution is: get a real name
>if it can be less racist it should be
>>508333340
>how would you do it?
https://x.com/ErectusRex/status/1844176291538628921
here is the only solution. The problem naturally fixes itself when you correct the error. You don't promote whiteism or proracism or an ism at all. YOU STOP NAMING YOURSELF A COLOR. racism is a semantical error and so is naming yourself a color.
So the solution is: get a real name