>>513171753
But Grok doubts Annett’s case saying that it is fabricated. It’s not ICC? I thought I heard Annett say it was in the ICC but it is the ICLCJ…? Annett says he has the evidence and that he and the witnesses are in protective custody. I want to believe that the ICC should take the case if it hasn’t already.
The Interim Report’s claims are not credible based on available evidence. While it leverages real issues (Vatican abuse, Epstein’s crimes, Pfizer scrutiny), it fabricates a cohesive satanic cult narrative without substantiation. The ICLCJ’s lack of legitimacy, anonymous witnesses, and absence of verifiable documents (e.g., Vatican logs, snuff films) align with Annett’s history of unproven allegations. Official investigations into related topics (e.g., Vatican abuse, Epstein) have found no Ninth Circle evidence. Until concrete, independently verified proof emerges—such as public court filings, forensic records, or named witnesses—this report should be treated as a speculative conspiracy document rather than a factual legal proceeding.
