>>520740472
Wow, so spooky.
(I didn't use a bot, all this was manually copy and pasted).
4chan Search
3 results for "0caf1ec48f3df757c41300578dd4be0b"
Personally, I think people being attached to a person is the best quality of Monarchy.
My mode of thinking is that a Cult of Personality is for the best to give people a common personality and identity.
It orders the people, like a singer on the stage: by this means, the people can communicate through one personality.
Without this cult of personality, the people are an amorphous blob and completely aimless.
A Cult of Personality instills civic order in a people and puts an end to partisan quarrels; it regiments a people into a great family and one body.
A work of One Person on the People -- that is to say, to make the people a colony of Monarchy -- is my political ideology, that people should strive for a Royal Shepherd to make them one flock or a Royal Father to make them One Family, and maintain this Cult of Personality by the preservation of his person (passing down his appearance / personality cult by reproducing him by hereditary transfer) -- the relationship between Father and Son being the cherry on the top, so that the masses too can image themselves as a Great Family and as Sons under a Father.
Constitutionalists kind of want an Anti-Monarchy (monarchy to prevent monarchy): that mode of constitutionalist thinking is basically what Jean Bodin is condemning here (where the aristocracy -gives- a fake crown to a person with the most honors, but none of the sovereignty). The reason Caesar rejected this Crown is because Caesar knew that is a fake monarchy (anti-monarchy to prevent real monarchy).
My mode of thinking is that a Cult of Personality is for the best to give people a common personality and identity.
It orders the people, like a singer on the stage: by this means, the people can communicate through one personality.
Without this cult of personality, the people are an amorphous blob and completely aimless.
A Cult of Personality instills civic order in a people and puts an end to partisan quarrels; it regiments a people into a great family and one body.
A work of One Person on the People -- that is to say, to make the people a colony of Monarchy -- is my political ideology, that people should strive for a Royal Shepherd to make them one flock or a Royal Father to make them One Family, and maintain this Cult of Personality by the preservation of his person (passing down his appearance / personality cult by reproducing him by hereditary transfer) -- the relationship between Father and Son being the cherry on the top, so that the masses too can image themselves as a Great Family and as Sons under a Father.
Constitutionalists kind of want an Anti-Monarchy (monarchy to prevent monarchy): that mode of constitutionalist thinking is basically what Jean Bodin is condemning here (where the aristocracy -gives- a fake crown to a person with the most honors, but none of the sovereignty). The reason Caesar rejected this Crown is because Caesar knew that is a fake monarchy (anti-monarchy to prevent real monarchy).
Personally, I think people being attached to a person is the best quality of Monarchy.
My mode of thinking is that a Cult of Personality is for the best to give people a common personality and identity.
It orders the people, like a singer on the stage: by this means, the people can communicate through one personality.
Without this cult of personality, the people are an amorphous blob and completely aimless.
A Cult of Personality instills civic order in a people and puts an end to partisan quarrels; it regiments a people into a great family and one body.
A work of One Person on the People -- that is to say, to make the people a colony of Monarchy -- is my political ideology, that people should strive for a Royal Shepherd to make them one flock or a Royal Father to make them One Family, and maintain this Cult of Personality by the preservation of his person (passing down his appearance / personality cult by reproducing him by hereditary transfer) -- the relationship between Father and Son being the cherry on the top, so that the masses too can image themselves as a Great Family and as Sons under a Father.
Constitutionalists kind of want an Anti-Monarchy (monarchy to prevent monarchy): that mode of constitutionalist thinking is basically what Jean Bodin is condemning here (where the aristocracy -gives- a fake crown to a person with the most honors, but none of the sovereignty). The reason Caesar rejected this Crown is because Caesar knew that is a fake monarchy (anti-monarchy to prevent real monarchy).
My mode of thinking is that a Cult of Personality is for the best to give people a common personality and identity.
It orders the people, like a singer on the stage: by this means, the people can communicate through one personality.
Without this cult of personality, the people are an amorphous blob and completely aimless.
A Cult of Personality instills civic order in a people and puts an end to partisan quarrels; it regiments a people into a great family and one body.
A work of One Person on the People -- that is to say, to make the people a colony of Monarchy -- is my political ideology, that people should strive for a Royal Shepherd to make them one flock or a Royal Father to make them One Family, and maintain this Cult of Personality by the preservation of his person (passing down his appearance / personality cult by reproducing him by hereditary transfer) -- the relationship between Father and Son being the cherry on the top, so that the masses too can image themselves as a Great Family and as Sons under a Father.
Constitutionalists kind of want an Anti-Monarchy (monarchy to prevent monarchy): that mode of constitutionalist thinking is basically what Jean Bodin is condemning here (where the aristocracy -gives- a fake crown to a person with the most honors, but none of the sovereignty). The reason Caesar rejected this Crown is because Caesar knew that is a fake monarchy (anti-monarchy to prevent real monarchy).