>>17927348
He probably just means it in the same sense Jesus does when he claims the disciples are one in the Father. But trinitarians believe is means that he is actually fully divine.
>>17927350
>professes distinct persons being the same being.
Yes but for RI not to be special pleading you need to find other users of this theory. Which you have not and as I have demonstrated the majority of philosophers don't find use for it. It's just a variant form of logic that only exists because under classical logic your metaphysics is pure nonsense. And if you use this to "solve" the logical problem of the trinity you have just conceded anyway.
>>17927357
>Your soul desires love, spirituality, etc…. But your flesh desires different things such as food, rest and drink.
Those attributes do not contradict so the analogy fails. For it to be equivalent to the incarnation my soul should desire love and my flesh should desire not love at the same time and in the same state (while they are not separated like after death)