>>521082783
from the commoners, who lack money anyway and who, when they have some, have inaccurate money in its ability to represent value (like "tainted" or contaminated money, if you will), in return for goods, services, and accesses that elites have and commoners need, even down to access to land with a basic home on it for the growing number of renters there will be among the commoners as we progress into the future, but rather elites, in return for parting with some good or service they have, or parting with their exclusive right to some plot of land with a usable home on it, will want goods, services, or most all labor, in lieu of the commoners' funny money that does not represent value very well in both the elite sphere of economic activity with its markets and in the commoner sphere of activity with its markets, leaving transactors who give up or receiver commoner monies frustrated and feeling ripped off due to the commoner monies' inability to measure value accurately (and as time progresses, the commoners' monies will just become ever worse at measuring market value, until it is so inaccurate that money has to be abandoned by the commoners in favor of a system of pure barter and corvee at some point in the future).

But there is an upside for the non-elites aka commoners, just as there is a plain upside for the elites, as the money system breaks down among commoners, which is that with corvee, and its particular form of statute labor conscripted by the state in any of its levels, gaining prevalence or typicality of use, large projects, from infrastructures to architectural features that stand as the pride of a region for centuries or millennia to come -- famous landmarks in the best scenario for their reputability -- will become easier to undertake, in virtue of the fact that it is necessarily easier to require labor from a commoner in exchange for basic things than it is to pay a commoner money that can then be used to buy anything, basic or