3 results for "125a754bf739df5e3ba1b01343b0e7c3"
>>545502106
bbbbased
>>543463021
>Take your own advice, you're already too far gone.
I don't goon to loli stuff, I prefer hags. But I'm not blinded by the afeorementioned puritanism some retards actually have to conflate drawings with real people. The extrapolation becomes, "where do you draw the line?". How cartoonish does a character have to be? Is it the mere fact they're presented as a child or act like a child? Does it even need to look like a human or does any cute character getting having sex count? All rhetorical questions, it's a cartoon so it doesn't matter either way. Assuming we're arguing in good faith of course.
>>543463029
>you're getting off to vivid descriptions of a childish body
As noted above, I don't goon to them. There's many different styles of art so without identifying specific authors and works, this feels like a real (insert jerkoff hand gesture here) argument.
>i mean, even if you aren't a pedophile, you are definitely taking pedophilic actions.
If you're not raping actual children or enjoying CSAM, those aren't pedophile actions.
>lolicons and cunnyfags are attracted to children lol accept it
I'm sure some are. If enjoying cunny had such an amazing conversion rate to real pedophillia, I think there'd be a lot more child rape cases on the books by now.
>>542214343
People fling the pedo word around to the point it's lost all meaning. If you say you'd like a girl who's 18 years old, you're considered a pedophile. I don't believe any accusations of pedophilia unless the FBI shows up at someone's house and frogwalks them out to the party van.