>>3984619
>How can you say humans are good by nature when you just confessed to being a prison gay incel?
Well, first of all, that's not what I said. Secondly, those two things are not mutually exclusive. Not even if we assume that not getting romantic attention when I want it is a moral failing on humanity.

What you are doing right now is precisely equivalent to those anons who project homosexual intent onto you because of what you post in this thread. Stop it.

>The Bible says point-blank that neither homosexuals nor the effeminate will inherit the kingdom of God
It says that nowhere. I've checked. There are a number of passages which explicitly or tacitly place an injunction against homosexual behavior, but the context of those passages have been lost to history. We know why the Old Testament laws forbid eating pork and shellfish, but we don't know why they forbade consensual sex between males, and this is never clarified to be explicitly sinful at any point later in the Bible, especially when Jesus comes along and starts talking about the Kingdom of Heaven. If such a passage existed I would have heard about it, especially from my parents and everyone else who was interested in telling me that male sexuality is dirty and sinful.

I must again express my profound disappointment in you. I thought you had put actual thought into your beliefs, but all you've said is basically "someone told me that this is what the Bible says, therefore this is true." The correct interpretation of the Bible is not nearly as clear as you think it is - you were just taught to interpret it a specific way and that anyone who disagreed was living in sin and could not be trusted. If you had ever interrogated your beliefs honestly you would be better able to defend and discuss the nuances of them than by simply asserting them to be true and spewing a bunch of "repent, sinner" bullshit. I suppose I'll have to look elsewhere to find someone able to have a proper conversation about this.