>>281659664
>>281659690
>They seem to be wholesome sheltered virgins
>Clothing doesn't mean anything per se.
It's actually worse if they're not fags. It means they're groomed.
>"let's put peacocked young boys that dress like they take it in the ass but still totally innocent and are dressed like that for no reason whatsoever as secondary characters"
>"let's name them Poly"
Only Pedowood would find that fetish relatable.
Gotta be real with you, I can't look at them. I get nauseous whenever I see a male dressed like that. The fact that they're innocent and pure (instead of choosing to be faggots) just makes it worse somehow.