>>536574961
>>536575171
Yes, although that image itself is a closeup of this
>https://xcancel.com/IGN_es/status/1953465061415977226
The one who posted it however was the same person who leaked stuff earlier and posted the Rouge clip. They kinda messed up though.

The gameplay comes from this video
>https://xcancel.com/artzyfizalt/status/1959639494937776242

That also contained 3 other videos going over Grand Prix stuff and with gameplay of characters yet to be seen.

When you go to the video though, you're told, "it was removed by the uploader"

>The clip from the leak account was posted at around 3:03 P.M UTC

>Theirs an earlier post of the same clip of gameplay posted at 2:58 P.M UTC
>https://xcancel.com/artzyfizalt/status/1959631407711473835

With the user asking why random vids of the game with
>less than 300 views had gameplay that had Miku in it
>User links to the videos at around 3:30 P.M
>By 5:16 P.M a user replies the videos have been deleted

>Who was the uploader?
The videos were removed but you can extract their thumbnails which reveals it was posted by a channel called XTGamer.

>Who is XTGamer?
A niche German game news site whose team consists of about 5 people
>https://www.xtgamer.net/team/
Of all these 5 people, only 1 of them has posted any articles to the site in months. All the other team members either work behind the scenes or have moved onto other sites going by their socials.

Meaning the leaker is probably this last active guy. It makes it reasonable for why they would have access to press stuff earlier and even now.

Of course the leaker could've just gotten the gameplay from the video, or even the other user that posted it earlier, and passed it off as their own I guess. The uploader on Youtube could've also just been someone else that deleted the video after realizing it was getting to much attention but the time gap of about 2 hrs between the clip and when the videos were deleted makes it seem like the person was paying close attention