>>17870477
Oh so you can't actually point out what I have asked of you, concession accepted. You're just repeating yourself without bringing up any new point nor engaging with what I said. Of course they are equivalent you fucking moron because most people have absolutely no need for a number system that has two zeros so it is converted, that doesn't mean it isn't there. it's just the usual convention that people expect. Graph for me i on the real number line. That's what you are demanding retard. it's not possible because it is undefined
>>17870480
No it just results from the usual way negatives are encoded in those machines.