>>24829963

I haven't read Stirner but the only people outside of Gouldner's intelectual elite defending Marx today are fat women and impotent men, and no one from the Gouldner set is posting on 4chan. Why should anyone take a materialist like that seriously then? There's no way you can escape your life as a total waste. If you're one of the fat females, the best you can hope for is to be impregnated by a nigger that will leave you. Unless you yourself are a nigger (I don't doubt your ability to read, and so I do doubt your being a nigger) that's a wretched hybrid-feeble miscgenate, or a child traumatized by their lack of a father, or both. Nature and nurture alike cover your failure. If you're male, you will never breed anyways. You'll die contributing nothing other than a handful of hours of your labor, unlikely as it is that you have a job of any meaning, or any job at all.

Tl;dr you're a gay retard. Kys.

Marxism is Talmudism. They're one and the same. Communist consciousness is ein sof.

Capitalism isn't inherently or definitionally Godless. Marxism is though. How do we know the Marxist intelectual class isn't driving this centralization of capital and all the commodity fetishism through their propagandistic media? Can the author of this book or a fag like OP develop a pure analysis of capital in a post-Marcuse in the CIA world? Invariably, if I were to try and example positive world events that were derived from what was ultimately capital interest, the obese skin tag neck beard Marxist on the other side of the iPhone will just claim all those good things are actually bad things, because to a Kabbalist-I mean, Marxist, only Marxism is good, and Marxism is good, because in the nihilation of their individuality through transition to communist consciousness, the Marxist can finally, at long last, escape all acountability, and lose their phobia of mirrors or non-angle shot photos.

Tl;dr oh boy, another Marx thread.