>>718552665
No, Nick is DEFINITELY furry-coded. What I'm saying here is that Bubsy seems WAY more deliberate somehow. And I'm not sure why.
Perhaps it's something to do with how his eyes look + the size/detail of his feet. Like, if this (>>718541691) is actual official artwork, and not just some fanart from Twitter... then that's actually kind of insane. But I can't tell whether the other poster here is joking.

As to anthro characters who don't give off "furry fetishist" vibes, I suppose the characters in Wes Anderson's "Fantastic Mr. Fox" fit that bill. I'm sure SOME weirdos out must sexualize 'em, but I somehow doubt their own creators saw them that way.