>>519473180
Obviously, it makes sense: Asian women are cute, why ? Because as I said, they descend from the heavens, so they aren’t weighed down by earthly gravity that distorts their faces like "white" "women" (orcs), who age quickly and develop a masculine bone structure to withstand it. Asian women, light as clouds, have retained their angelic features. They are human for the span of a lifetime but have kept their celestial powers
4chan Search
6 results for "1695877aaf01dda7fcf5fbb4ff825367"
>>514727176
White "women" have exclusively benefited from the Hollywood spotlight for over a century thanks to Western hegemony, what I call the "Marilyn Monroe era," but this whole psyop is now over and americanization decline. Now we realize, unironically, thanks to trannies, that white women are literally men. Trannies exposed white "women" as their equals.
Btw, those who are into white women, i.e., wignats, brown and niggers, constantly highlight their angular features or their side profiles, but aside from looking like dudes who are into lookmaxing, what's attractive about that? It's almost homosexuality. They are, along with African "women", those who are morphologically closest to men. Besides, the meme "one race, the human race " comparing a white "women" and a negress "women" makes me laugh because there is no difference beetwen them.
Actually, they can't be cute because they have too masculine a bone structure.
There are some white girls, even if rare, it exists, who are in kpop and jpop groups. They are 5 to 10 cm taller than the other members, have an angular face and when they try to be cute it's just cringe, it's just genetically impossible for them, so they have almost no fans. Its over. They are only intended to be vulgars receptacles.
In fact, Asian women are to white "women" what the heightpill is to men, a cruel blackpill.
White "women" have exclusively benefited from the Hollywood spotlight for over a century thanks to Western hegemony, what I call the "Marilyn Monroe era," but this whole psyop is now over and americanization decline. Now we realize, unironically, thanks to trannies, that white women are literally men. Trannies exposed white "women" as their equals.
Btw, those who are into white women, i.e., wignats, brown and niggers, constantly highlight their angular features or their side profiles, but aside from looking like dudes who are into lookmaxing, what's attractive about that? It's almost homosexuality. They are, along with African "women", those who are morphologically closest to men. Besides, the meme "one race, the human race " comparing a white "women" and a negress "women" makes me laugh because there is no difference beetwen them.
Actually, they can't be cute because they have too masculine a bone structure.
There are some white girls, even if rare, it exists, who are in kpop and jpop groups. They are 5 to 10 cm taller than the other members, have an angular face and when they try to be cute it's just cringe, it's just genetically impossible for them, so they have almost no fans. Its over. They are only intended to be vulgars receptacles.
In fact, Asian women are to white "women" what the heightpill is to men, a cruel blackpill.
>>23234465
White "women" have exclusively benefited from the Hollywood spotlight for over a century thanks to Western hegemony, what I call the "Marilyn Monroe era," but this whole psyop is now over and americanization decline. Now we realize, unironically, thanks to trannies, that white women are literally men. Trannies exposed white "women" as their equals.
Btw, those who are into white women, i.e., wignats, brown and niggers, constantly highlight their angular features or their side profiles, but aside from looking like dudes who are into lookmaxing, what's attractive about that? It's almost homosexuality. They are, along with African "women", those who are morphologically closest to men. Besides, the meme "one race, the human race " comparing a white "women" and a negress "women" makes me laugh because there is no difference beetwen them.
Actually, they can't be cute because they have too masculine a bone structure.
There are some white girls, even if rare, it exists, who are in kpop and jpop groups. They are 5 to 10 cm taller than the other members, have an angular face and when they try to be cute it's just cringe, it's just genetically impossible for them, so they have almost no fans. Its over. They are only intended to be vulgars receptacles.
In fact, Asian women are to white "women" what the heightpill is to men, a cruel blackpill.
White "women" have exclusively benefited from the Hollywood spotlight for over a century thanks to Western hegemony, what I call the "Marilyn Monroe era," but this whole psyop is now over and americanization decline. Now we realize, unironically, thanks to trannies, that white women are literally men. Trannies exposed white "women" as their equals.
Btw, those who are into white women, i.e., wignats, brown and niggers, constantly highlight their angular features or their side profiles, but aside from looking like dudes who are into lookmaxing, what's attractive about that? It's almost homosexuality. They are, along with African "women", those who are morphologically closest to men. Besides, the meme "one race, the human race " comparing a white "women" and a negress "women" makes me laugh because there is no difference beetwen them.
Actually, they can't be cute because they have too masculine a bone structure.
There are some white girls, even if rare, it exists, who are in kpop and jpop groups. They are 5 to 10 cm taller than the other members, have an angular face and when they try to be cute it's just cringe, it's just genetically impossible for them, so they have almost no fans. Its over. They are only intended to be vulgars receptacles.
In fact, Asian women are to white "women" what the heightpill is to men, a cruel blackpill.
>>509813595
>The short answer is niggers
>The long answer is Jews
Not rly
In fact, its because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.
If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it. To summarize, liking non Asian women is strongly correlated with homosexuality.
>The short answer is niggers
>The long answer is Jews
Not rly
In fact, its because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.
If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it. To summarize, liking non Asian women is strongly correlated with homosexuality.