>>40858136
Terence Tao is a genius, but falls short on that one, like everybody else.

Another Terence, Howard at this time claims 1x1=2. Verbally you can give a longwinded explanation why it is so, but mathematically it isn't so. Same thing with dividing by 0. Verbally, you could say a cake divided with nothing remains as it is. Mathematically it isn't so. So, what is 0 really?