>>521173955
Anon, the entire video is idiotic. It is filled with bullshit quotes and platitudes by opposition leaders of political parties in Britain. It has no sources and does not make any sense. It insists on nonsense:
>like the indians having super ships, even though their technology never even reached the 1400s portuguese caravel, and there is zero (0) cultural impact of indian trade. Rather, there is plenty of trade of foreigners navigating to India for spice trade, which happens to grow naturally from indian soil so indians can't fuck it up
>so they were ALWAYS commodity sporters in the trade routes, they were never skilled in metallurgy, manufactury, or anything
>theirs was a rural semi-feudal shithole with an immense population but zero social cohesion and zero capacity for war that was regularly conquered by tiny mountain tribes from abroad and never managed to expand from their home
Nothing in this video is true. It is bullshit from beginning to end, with maybe an exception being the fact that the british indeed starved India. But even that lacks the proper context, which was the world wars.
As Niall Ferguson (the most skilled apologist historian for british colonialism) puts it, if the British has not protected their colonies from Japan, which wanted India, there is zero doubt the Japanese would have promoted a genocide in a never before seen scale in the history of mankind.
He argues that the British had no economic benefit to sticking with their colonies against Japan, and if they warred with Japan, it protected their foreign servants from a demonic genocidal true evil empire that to this day does not feel any shame for commiting atrocity.
A two minutes talk with a japanese reveal they are not good people to those beneath them. Their only regrets in China and Korea is that they didn't kill enough.
4chan Search
2 results for "17c2f4f5eac4b103170444416bc5ab2e"
>>520504634
>In short, there is nothing moral about libertarianism. It is the ideology of loners who hate everyone
You were doing well until you hit this platitude where you just had to have an emotional catharsis and hurl an insult towards the absurdity of libertarianism. Libertarianism is made to be moral, and even if in practice it is an exercise in ignoring the ancient problem of evil, it is the most moral regime for individuals who are equal and endowed with reason.
In reality, individuals disregard completely the needs of the groups, will invade the rights of others, will pursue only their individual interests, and unlike libertarians seem to believe, individual interests are exercised YES at the cost of social cohesion (just look at business hiding job postings from americans so they can hire cheaper foreign labour. They'd not even try to hide them under libertarianism, just hire a billion indians because there'd be no law to protect american workers).
I agree with everything.
>>520504682
THERE IS *NOTHING* to answer.
Unless your political philosophy provides a solution to the JEET QUESTION, it is void Enlightenment nonsense about to be yeeted out of this planet.
People are not the same. Capitalism leads to commodification of the human being. Individual interests are no better than fulfilling addiction. Community is what provides happiness, and in the end, capitalism is just another ensemble of smoking addicts who have all right to destroy their own bodies smoking and find zero happiness from fulfilling their own voluntary desires, but cannot be allowed to destroy everybody else and destroy humanity by doing it in public and en masse.
The best anti-libertarian, anti-liberal, anti-open bordersm anti-freedom piece of literature are the movies CODEX PAJEET ii and iii.
The moment you realize people are *NOT* the same, libertarianism falls apart.
>In short, there is nothing moral about libertarianism. It is the ideology of loners who hate everyone
You were doing well until you hit this platitude where you just had to have an emotional catharsis and hurl an insult towards the absurdity of libertarianism. Libertarianism is made to be moral, and even if in practice it is an exercise in ignoring the ancient problem of evil, it is the most moral regime for individuals who are equal and endowed with reason.
In reality, individuals disregard completely the needs of the groups, will invade the rights of others, will pursue only their individual interests, and unlike libertarians seem to believe, individual interests are exercised YES at the cost of social cohesion (just look at business hiding job postings from americans so they can hire cheaper foreign labour. They'd not even try to hide them under libertarianism, just hire a billion indians because there'd be no law to protect american workers).
I agree with everything.
>>520504682
THERE IS *NOTHING* to answer.
Unless your political philosophy provides a solution to the JEET QUESTION, it is void Enlightenment nonsense about to be yeeted out of this planet.
People are not the same. Capitalism leads to commodification of the human being. Individual interests are no better than fulfilling addiction. Community is what provides happiness, and in the end, capitalism is just another ensemble of smoking addicts who have all right to destroy their own bodies smoking and find zero happiness from fulfilling their own voluntary desires, but cannot be allowed to destroy everybody else and destroy humanity by doing it in public and en masse.
The best anti-libertarian, anti-liberal, anti-open bordersm anti-freedom piece of literature are the movies CODEX PAJEET ii and iii.
The moment you realize people are *NOT* the same, libertarianism falls apart.