Search results for "17e626583577c30860e083083e4319bc" in md5 (2)

/pol/ - Nick Fuentes is 100% correct.
Anonymous Australia No.516652973
>>516652716
>Ok he's not actually 100% correct, he's completely wrong, but I have now decided that I no longer care about what he said....."

Nice try faggot, I never asserted that he was right about the Russia thing and therefore can’t have “backpedaled” on something I didn’t say. I said he’s right that your “image analysis” conspiracy theories are low IQ and objectively embarrassing to the right wing movement, alienating high IQ people. Very cowardly and pathetic of you to try to deliberately misrepresent me. Very sneaky and unmanly.
/lgbt/ - poly goals
Anonymous No.41088560
>>41088531
Yeah, try that angle. It’s worth a shot at least. A delusional cope a day keeps the noose away.