>>17845934
>You live in an upside down world if you think reading the limitations section of a study you disagree with means that the findings of the study are wrong lol
I never claimed that the findings of the study were wrong. I pointed out that even the authors of this study contradict your nonsensical claim about family environment not being a confounding variable: >>17845304
>>17845938
Experiencing sexual arousal to children means you are sexually aroused by children, i.e. you are a pedophile. Being a pedophile means you are sexually attracted to children, regardless of whether you act on it, or even acknowledge it. The men in these studies do not find adult men, grandmothers, or horses sexually arousing.
>>17845941
It's a consistent finding in plethysmographic studies on normal men. Plethysmographic studies are far more valuable than self-report because participants can not lie about their sexual arousal patterns. Sexual attraction to children is very common, with roughly one in four men meeting the "psychiatric" definition of pedophilia.
>>17845960
When did I ever claim that adult-child sex is acceptable because sexual attraction to children is common?