>>725068135
>But you could argue that's how humans also work, which It would be more a philosophical discussion than a CS one.
NTA or any of them but that's exactly what those anons are saying.
"the immature poet imitates and the mature poet plagiarizes" or the shitty Steve jobs misquote "Good artists copy; great artists steal."
Everything builds on something else. How it got there is pointless. A complex algo deriving weight based on a vectors versus digital versus latex versus oil versus charcoal they've all been accepted to have the same similar artistic merit in society.
The only distinction with AI is its lack of humanity, not how it got there.