>>512785224
I'm not convinced the AoC should be lowered below 16 or 18. However the punishments should be much less severe in the case of willing 14-17 year olds
Especially if they're already getting dicked-down by high school boys anyways

>>512576478
>>Bad for business
>judging by you picture collection, I'd assume this is the only true thing you've said. If I were a glownigger I'd be looking at you as a potential CSAM distributor.
kek! You must be broke and projecting if you think I would resort to such a lowly activity for income
It's bad for business because I'm long Palantir and other stocks that have massively benefited from the Trump admin