>>936277567
This is a quasi-metaphysical word-salad that doesn't address anything I wrote.
>>936277655
Your assertions collapse under scrutiny.
You are incapable of even discussing this subject because your pithy proclamations such as "Western civilization isn’t dying — it’s changing" open the door to the meticulous examination of what the "changes" in fact are and the ultimate realization that 99.9% of them have been changes for the worse.
>Losing the appetite to dominate isn’t death. It might be maturity.
Yes, we should let others enslave and oppress us, because surely he that submits to slavery is one who has made "the mature choice."
And your "geopolitical domination" criticism falls flat because Buchanan is and always has been a hardcore non-interventionist.
>If the West has a crisis, it’s not immigration — it’s spiritual exhaustion, consumerism without meaning, freedom without direction
The people driving mass immigration are the exact same people promulgating the other things you listed.
>Yes, demographics are changing. So what?
Yes, demographics are changing and all the changes being incorporated are a net negative for society at large, as opposed to having a universal social benefit.
>Cultures adapt or die, and the West has been built — at every stage — by incorporating the energy, labor, and ideas of outsiders. From Rome to the Renaissance to the Internet, the West thrives when it’s curious, not when it’s paranoid.
Besides the fact that Rome and Renaissance Europe epitomized the very same "geopolitical domination" you argue against in your third sentence.
