>>520948288
>So, which are the lessons of the Syrian civil war in the military field?
Don't make truces with your enemy so they may rebuild or be propped up by foreign powers to attack you in the future, kill them all. It also reinforced the notion that large cities are the modern citadels, and that you either take them by storm while there are not enough motivated defenders, or they are doomed to become months long slugfests, but we already knew that from Leningrad, Stalingrad, etc.
>It was worth fighting?
I'd say generally it is worth fighting so that one's nation may become something greater, but that's just me looking at it from a nationalist point of view, different individuals see things differently. Assad's regime kept the jews at bay and the tribal and religious minorities of each others throats. Now that he's gone, the jews come and go through southern Syria as they please and have outright taken Mount Hermon, and every other week you hear about a syrian tribes killing each other. I can understand how people were unwilling to support Assad's regime on its last days, since the Syrian economy wasn't doing well (it relied heavily on oil extraction and the Syrian government never took back several oil fields that remained in rebel controled areas), but now that it's gone they'll have to deal with the instability that comes from having a weak central government in a multicultural and multireligious country. The fact that their neighbors will be biting at their heels all the while will also make any recovery much harder.
>Did the neocons won at the end?
They got most of what they wanted, but I don't think even them see it as the end of their ambitions in Syria.