>Every woman must marry and have kids before turning 25 years old. No such thing as divorce.

What if this became the norm again, as it had been for 4000 years of civilization? In fact old civilizations even had laws in place, so if the father wasn't around to make the daughter marry, she would be forced by the state - even widowers were forced to re-marry after a certain timeframe.

What does /pol/ think? What are the political arguments in favor/against?

>the only political topic that matters
>/pol/ does not talk about it

You are unironically a bunch of weak willed simps, who give power for women for nothing in return.

You are not my brothers at all.

>>520849414
the problem is women

not "DA JEWS"

There is a massive movement talking about repealing the 19th, revoking women's rights in all countries, and we've even had LITERAL incel revolutions already in 3 countries this year, for the first time ever taking back women's rights to choose their own husbands and forcing every single woman to marry again. Even some women are speaking pro-revoking their own voting rights.

>Hide all other thread
>Sage all other threads
>Do not participate in any other threads

Only 1 political topic matters to men: that women gamed the voting system and the marriage system, to gain total control of civilization and turn the once male created civilization against men, making them slaves of the women, doing everything in return of nothing. Talking about other political topics will not change your life, will not improve your life, will not fix any of the problems you complain about on a daily basis. Only addressing the woman question will fix your life.

Women have turned us men into slaves by gaming reproduction and voting.

hide all other threads

There is a large anti-women voting rights movement outside of /pol/. There is an increasingly number of men ( and women too ) saying that women voting has profoundly negatively impacted men, society, and that it doesn't make any sense and should be changed back.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NISpyT-XWuI
>https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yAeSFAK1FTI
>https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sIxwubw70qk

You see this movement growing a lot especially on twitter, with even normies openly calling it out in their real accounts. Yet on /pol/, crickets. /pol/ is not even debating nor acknowledging one of the most impactful and fastest growing movements in modern culture. And now that 70%+ of all men are desperately alone but still being drafted for war, this movement is likely to explode in followers that identify with it.

But /pol/ who usually set trends and spotted things first, seems even entirely unaware of what is happening.

What gives /pol/?