The overkill x264 and AV1 rips are too big for catbox so the best I can do is post a CRF 30 M6 SVT-AV1 encode, which unsurprisingly still passed quality validation at 96.66 VMAF.

https://files.catbox.moe/74jz6l.webm

A little bit more on the quality validation aspect of this test. In short you only need to exceed 95 VMAF as this is the rough score that causes people to fail to distinguish the original video and the lossy copy. Some genetically gifted people might require higher scores and some lower scores but it's generally agreed that a once you exceed 95 less than 10% of the human population will be able to make any kind of distinction of which is which. As you exceed 95 VMAF the file size bloat will get worse and worse so keep that in mind.

>>106328249
It truly is such a sadness. VP9 is a slow complex mess and few anons here seem to make encodes better than slow x264 rips desu. Like it's "b-frames" won't even fucking work unless you explicitly enable them through a 2 pass encode and even then you're gimped if it's 8-bit, so only 10-bit 2-pass VP9 encodes are worth the squeeze but then you have to worry about anons who don't have the 10-bit VP9 decoder.