>>17989328
>They (actually it's the same guy being sameflag) don't want to understand that r1b is not exclusive to IE and what clades are
Slander. It's like you can't even read or something. I have been clear from the beginning that R1b is not exclusive to IEs.

>>17989322
Uh oh. We are looking at Eskimo languages now. How did this happen ANE-denier sisters?

>>17989330
The gene flow I am talking about is only a useful marker to correlate the transmission of words. I am not interested in schizophrenic Nordicism.

>>17989348
>the guys refuted you saying that you ran away
There was no refutation. I was referred to some paper which disagrees with Indo-Uralic but it doesn't even acknowledge the recent book "The Precursors of Proto-Indo-European" so all I see are scholars talking past each other.

>R1b-V88, which, as already explained, is neither ANE nor Indo-European, but WHG
WHGs received an ANE haplogroup. What exactly is not computing?