>>16773672
>GW170817 is one of two neutron star detection,the rest are black holes,
The argument still stands, doesn't matter the reason: No other experimental detections have any corroborated confirmation except that one instance.
>I'm quite sure you just made this up
Unless the AI straight up lied to me here. I'm not autistic enough to dig through mount of PDFs atm, but you are welcome to.
>But you do claim to know, you are claiming that all of this is "dog shit" and not gravitational waves.
No, I claim your claim to know for sure at the current moment what you are detecting is GW and specifically GW from things you point at is "dog shit".
Maybe we find out you are lucking out astronomically and are absolutely right about everything down the road. Maybe I'll win the lottery tonight. Anything is possible.