>>544697000
Okay....
So this post here
>>544695941
Is highlighting that theyve written Sylvanas poorly.
The statement in 2025 is directly contradictory to the statement in 2023.
The only way this isnt the case is if theres a lore beat in between where she changed her mind and still realized she doesnt give a fuck.
Garrosh on the other hand is completely content with his decisions as he was firm in his beliefs and...didnt do nothing wrong.
Garrosh was a reactionary. Sylvanas was not.
Thats what youve gotten wrong in your assessment.
Sylvanas chose to burn down the world tree to impact the Maw / Shadowlands.
All of the actions against Garrosh were the chiefs and alliance putting him further and further into a box to the point where he had enough.
>>544697460
Globochomo wants to groom you into being horny for kids and animals. Do not participate with this user.