>>718472573
Right looks like a dogshit transfer they did from an old dvd release, which is probably exactly what it is. A shitton of early bluray releases weren't actually new remasters of the film, they would just take an existing master, upscale it and in some cases add a terrible sharpening filter over it.

And yeah there are some badly color graded remasters out there, but I don't think we should look back to the earliest bluray releases as good examples because they were just as terrible but in different ways. Your stunning movie shot no film should not look like a cheap fucking tv film with halos around edges from sharpening filters and a magenta tint to everything that literally came from the limited color range that dvds had.

If you think the bottom looks worse here you need to jump in front of a train immediately.