>>512814330
>>512814548
>>512817377
1. Sexualized Commentary on Women (Especially White Conservative Influencers):
portion of posts (over 40%) are replies to female influencers, particularly (@IsabellaMDeLuca), a conservative content creator. These are overtly thirsty and objectifying, focusing on physical attributes like "big tee tees" (breasts), "knockers," or "boner inducer." Examples include requests for more revealing photos or edits (e.g., "put her in a hijab" or "post a photo of you wearing this without your brother in it").
Similar replies target other women like (@courtneyknill) and (@kirstentoosweet), often critiquing or praising body types in contrast to celebrities like Sydney Sweeney (e.g., "White women like this exist, yet they chose Sydney Sweeney to market jeans").
This theme peaks in replies to posts about fashion, vacations, or personal photos, with low engagement (0-12 likes).
2. Trolling "Noticers" and Promoting Interracial Dynamics:
30% of posts mock "noticers" by encouraging or celebrating interracial relationships, especially black men with white ("snowbunny") or Asian ("ricebunny") women. Phrases like "How to piss off the noticer" or "Nothing pisses off the noticer like a black man with an Asian woman" appear repeatedly, often with images or videos of such couples.
Posts highlight perceived hypocrisy, such as "They only mind mixed couples when the man isn't white" or defending violence in interracial contexts (e.g., "Keep your hands to yourself" in response to altercations).
This includes direct antagonism, like calling out accounts as "run by non-whites" or labeling critics with names like "Manpreet" to imply Indian origin.
