>>18069343
>It's based on self-evident inspiration actually.
That's baseless circular reasoning. John is canon because John says so.
>The term "all scripture" here includes the entire Old Testament as well as the New Testament.
There was no "new testament" when that was written so no that cope won't work. Also imagine using the guy that advocates for the old laws he called essentially defective to be abolished as your evidence.
>Do you have one unequivocal example?
I have plenty more but I don't gish gallop so we will stick to this one. You have to prove that Jehoiada and Berekiah are the same person to get out of this one. It's so bad that Christians have to resort to the scribal error excuse see (pic) the alternative is to claim the latter was an ancestor that wasn't relevant and so your "son of" doesn't become literal anymore