>>282410956
>How
Me not claiming she *is* lying is not proof that she *is* telling the truth. Your claim requires her statement to he true, so if you want to make a truth claim, you have to prove it. I merely provided a reasonable doubt, that you can’t rebut, so she’s presumed innocent until further evidence comes to light.
Of course you can headcanon her as whatever you want, but you’re engaging in speculation, not provable canon.
>Doesn’t cut it
Means, motive, opportunity, and a previous example of the behavior is more than enough to be plausibly deniable.
>>282410982
>Prove she hasn’t had sex (a negative)
The default of any speculative action is inaction. The burden of proof is on the accuser. Stocking is innocent until proven guilty of being a space alien, an ace murderer, a man, and yes, a person who has sex.
>>282411049
Not me.