>>5034538
>"We won"
You type like a faggot.
Also that's just a paraphyletic clade then, which if you say that's reptiles then sure but then if you want to be actually and truly consistent then you'd need to include everything between.

(picrel is likely outdated/possibly wrong since I know turtles are taxonomic weirdos, but it helps illustrate the proposed grouping of reptiles here)
The difference w/ synapsids is that including all Diapsids as "reptiles" is way more consistent than including all amniotes, and you would need to include mammals as reptiles if you considered therapsids like dimetrodon to be a 'reptile'.