>>18112205
>Yes exactly, you could not molest freeborn children
Having a sexual relationship with a freeborn boy was not considered a form of hubris.

>Aeschines then clarifies that statute doesn't really apply to the slaves
No he doesn't, learn to read.

>You were given the exact passages
Can you repost them, obsessed faggot?

>The slurs indicate that they hated gay people
Can you provide evidence for this assertion?

>They had a slur specifically for men who were active partners
Source?

>Lycurgus, the *legendary* Spartan lawgiver. His opinion. What do you think that means in a book titled "On The Spartan Constitution"?
Xenophon states in chapter 14 of the same book that the Spartans don't follow the laws of Lycurgus, retard:
>[7] Yet we need not wonder if these reproaches are levelled at them, since it is manifest that they obey neither their god nor the laws of Lycurgus.

>Episthenes? Alexander?
I don't recall Alexander's sexual relationship with Hephaestion being one between a master and slave. He was gifted the eunuch Bagoas, who was treated well by Alexander and actually held an important political role in Alexander's court. Episthenes intervenes to save a beautiful boy from being murdered, the passage never actually states that a sexual relationship existed between the two. These are your only two examples, and they don't even support your position.

>Everyday
Every day you obsessively post, seething, in threads about homosexuality on 4chan:
>>18111681

>that I get to make you look stupid and point out your lies and shit up your threads is a good one.
Gonna cry?

>>3995067
Shos are legal in Europe so they are cuddling their boyfriends rn