>>9516
>/vt/2
>directly to their streams and content
I think this is the most important part of the rule since it prefaces everything else. Someone discussing the weight of a vtuber because they said/posted it is fine from the standpoint of discussing the stream/tweet, and so on. But discussing the weight, height, age, etc. outside of the context of vtubing, a 2/2.5/3D character streaming, has nothing to do with the board's purpose. Similarly not everything that a vtuber posts or streams might pertain directly to vtubing. Realistically, from the standpoint of applying the rules, it doesn't matter what is and isn't said on stream or social media, at all, the CONTEXT in which it is posted is far more telling than whatever capacity of fact checking you could endeavour upon by looking up clips (yes, you don't watch streams let alone the ones from my favourite indie chuuba). Someone discussing height when it's mentioned during a stream that is happening makes sense contextually and is directly pertaining to streams and content. Someone mentioning height outside of that context (streams and content) might very well be engaging in discussion that's disallowed by /vt/2, and if it's not evident by the post itself then looking at the reply chain usually clarifies what is being discussed (the context). Whether most people want to admit it or not they're most likely already operating in this way to some capacity since it's logistically impossible to know every single /vt/2 thing that ever has or will be posted, and the same can be said about all other rules, it's much simpler to look at the context and to make a decision about it based on that. I also think that this is the fairest way to go about it since we shouldn't be giving some guy 3 days for liveposting something that was said on a stream while someone who is mentioning age or whatever else outside of that context is most likely discussing IRL shit and the conversation they're having (context) should evidence that.