>>538788637
No, I see plenty of people get trash too. "Mostly" isn't true though; it would be relegated to the garbage heap if that were the case rather than being one of the most played cards in high rank duels. Just throwing down a bunch of random summons, even weak ones, is almost never bad (the worst that can happen is it forces the opponent to burn a whole bunch of MP) especially if you drop Abigail or the Freys alongside. And if it does happen to be a bad roll, Standard Book users are almost always Dumbledore or occasionally Luna and only need to expend MP to charge their echo, so they still benefit from even a bad draw.
Meanwhile if the opponent is playing a deck which actually cares about what the specific cards being played are, they are nearly always harmed because it wastes their MP and takes away the cards they need. So a lot of the time there's a guaranteed benefit for the user and a guaranteed detriment for the opponent just by casting it.
Also Pranktastic isn't weak at all; it's awful to fight in the same way that Inflatus is. If you get hit by it when there are a bunch of summons on the field, or Abigail/Freys, or a spell like Whizbang or Obscurus, it's easily 1000-2000 damage.
>>538790158
It's not a new thing; ring doughnuts are a specific subtype! The most well-known certainly, but that doesn't invalidate the existence of the rest. And yes they are of course pastries, but that's an even broader category and not nearly specific enough. You could apply some taxonomic classifications to them probably, like...
>Species: Frosted Ring Doughnut
>Genus: Ring Doughnuts
>Family: Doughnuts
>Order: Fried Pastries
>Class: Pastries
>Phylum: Baked Goods
Or something like that anyway; I feel like there are definitely more subcategories I've missed?
4chan Search
2 results for "21d81e8a3a8f0434fd84c2ff2372ef59"
>>538788637
No, I see plenty of people get trash too. "Mostly" isn't true though; it wouldn't be relegated to the garbage heap if that were the case rather than being one of the most played cards in high rank duels. Just throwing down a bunch of random summons, even weak ones, is almost never bad (the worst that can happen is it forces the opponent to burn a whole bunch of MP) especially if you drop Abigail or the Freys alongside. And if it does happen to be a bad roll, Standard Book users are almost always Dumbledore or occasionally Luna and only need to expend MP to charge their echo, so they still benefit from even a bad draw.
Meanwhile if the opponent is playing a deck which actually cares about what the specific cards being played are, they are nearly always harmed because it wastes their MP and takes away the cards they need. So a lot of the time there's a guaranteed benefit for the user and a guaranteed detriment for the opponent just by casting it.
Also Pranktastic isn't weak at all; it's awful to fight in the same way that Inflatus is. If you get hit by it when there are a bunch of summons on the field, or Abigail/Freys, or a spell like Whizbang or Obscurus, it's easily 1000-2000 damage.
>>538790158
It's not a new thing; ring doughnuts are a specific subtype! The most well-known certainly, but that doesn't invalidate the existence of the rest. And yes they are of course pastries, but that's an even broader category and not nearly specific enough. You could apply some taxonomic classifications to them probably, like...
>Species: Frosted Ring Doughnut
>Genus: Ring Doughnuts
>Family: Doughnuts
>Order: Fried Pastries
>Class: Pastries
>Phylum: Baked Goods
Or something like that anyway; I feel like there are definitely more subcategories I've missed?
No, I see plenty of people get trash too. "Mostly" isn't true though; it wouldn't be relegated to the garbage heap if that were the case rather than being one of the most played cards in high rank duels. Just throwing down a bunch of random summons, even weak ones, is almost never bad (the worst that can happen is it forces the opponent to burn a whole bunch of MP) especially if you drop Abigail or the Freys alongside. And if it does happen to be a bad roll, Standard Book users are almost always Dumbledore or occasionally Luna and only need to expend MP to charge their echo, so they still benefit from even a bad draw.
Meanwhile if the opponent is playing a deck which actually cares about what the specific cards being played are, they are nearly always harmed because it wastes their MP and takes away the cards they need. So a lot of the time there's a guaranteed benefit for the user and a guaranteed detriment for the opponent just by casting it.
Also Pranktastic isn't weak at all; it's awful to fight in the same way that Inflatus is. If you get hit by it when there are a bunch of summons on the field, or Abigail/Freys, or a spell like Whizbang or Obscurus, it's easily 1000-2000 damage.
>>538790158
It's not a new thing; ring doughnuts are a specific subtype! The most well-known certainly, but that doesn't invalidate the existence of the rest. And yes they are of course pastries, but that's an even broader category and not nearly specific enough. You could apply some taxonomic classifications to them probably, like...
>Species: Frosted Ring Doughnut
>Genus: Ring Doughnuts
>Family: Doughnuts
>Order: Fried Pastries
>Class: Pastries
>Phylum: Baked Goods
Or something like that anyway; I feel like there are definitely more subcategories I've missed?