>>938744161 >i'm glad the all the antivaxers were all knowledgeable of medical instruments and virology, if they're doing their own 'research'
Or maybe we're just not going to blindly trust people who were friends with Epstein.
>>513170896
The people who are in the Epstein files are also the ones behind the jab. So if you don't trust the Epstein affiliated people (and rightly so, I might add) then why would you ever trust their mysterious new injection which they have legal immunity for being injected into your blood stream?