>>512580722
>judaism AND Christianity
I mean when you say it like this, you’re implying you’re aware they are infact different and see, kikes will totally throw themselves under the bus if it means they get to tag Christians. Even though the gospel is condemning all world religions (which are just man trying to justify himself to God when they’re sinners.)
Why am I not shocked that the atheist (who has a double negative position) believes that religion is infact what the Bible is advocating for, when it’s juxtaposed against religion, but doesn’t realize that the gospel condemns religion, it’s a satanic strawman to help you deny God. The caveat is that you think dick snipping isn’t required but you mistakenly believe that the cross means a continuation of these things or their mere introduction ever implied they count toward salvation.
Because most atheists do not actually care enough to study their opponents and what they actually believe, I’m not holding my breath on any of them understanding that what I’m suggesting, as the book is suggesting it with the cross. Is that Satan has you in a false dichotomy, evidence has nothing to do with the question, religion is a gatekeeping mechanism to salvation, and there’s a reason why the temptation to hate hypocritical kid diddling retards in robes is too delicious to ignore.
Its by design, and you should recoil in horror that all religion is physical evidence of Satan’s existence and, mankind’s guilt manifest before the law by viewing its following as compulsory without realizing what Jesus did, and what it means because of who he actually is.