>>513043967

>its safe to assume you are here for the express purpose of begging people to stop listening to Nick.

no the opposite. i want people to listen to nick carefully, and understand his goals and refute the claims he's making by recontextualizing them through my analysis of his objectives. would i really have been spamming this take of his if i didnt want people to listen to him.

go ahead and defend this fantastically fuckign terrible take of his i love posting specifically because i want people to see him saying it.

>>512873592

i do, they never deny it either. here are the angles worth pushing

>nick is not racialist

>nick is fine with jews racially if they are christian

>nick supports the existence of greater israel and hates hamas

>nick has gone on record multiple times stating his politcs are not far right but center right, and his goals are deracializing discourse on the right