>>150217476
>I have no idea how obesity is hot to people
>I'm into some weird shit but there is a linear train of thought that makes them sexually appealing
Yeah, and there is a linear train of thought for why larger bodies are sexually stimulating, you're either unable to understand it or refusing to. I don't know what other kinks you have that you can so easily see the logical pathway (odd you refuse to share while calling out other fetishes for being weird) but the larger girls is pretty simple and fat is even easier so can't understand why you're so stumped.

It's going to be unique to everyone why they specifically like what they like so I'll remain vague: the simplest line of thought is "Pliable soft bodies are enjoyable to touch and be intimate with"
There are a lot of ways a brain might get to that idea, some options are:
>Excess and indulgence are hot, a pleasure focused desire is going to be sexually gratifying, apply that to the physical form, a body born of excess and indulgence.
>I want maximum cuddling, I want a partner who is endlessly comforting to hold and sink myself against
>I want Breedable companionship, larger well fed companion are better stock and sign of good living/fun. I crave bigger bodies.
>Boobs good, big boobs better, but what if whole body is soft boob?
And then things like inflation and GTS are just variants of that with certain elements aligned differently as well as methods either being adjusted accordingly or outright simplified to meet these new ideals. (And to be perfectly honest both are likely born of Autistic hiccups in the brain which seek a simpler version, such as inflation just wanting "round body" and cutting out the realisms to seek literally round body shape)
You've also got the darker sides of the fetish: People who like it for humiliation dynamics, people who like it for cruelty infliction, people who have a direct fetish for fat itself and the method of delivery is irrelevant.

See? Easy to follow trains of thought.