>>64127150
>Congrats on getting a 3rd gen engine from the 70s working.
If you think a F100-PW-132 is comparable to an F100-PW-100 then there's nothing to discuss... lmao even.

>irrelevant kvetching
ignored.

>working until 2010, and it only had a 400 hour life. They finally got it to 1500 hour life cycle like 70s Soviet engines
Impressive, a figure of 10 years ago before the WS-10 was cleared for service without restrictions. ADA187934 is a clear example of the problems of developing a modern turbofan without a good FADEC and years of real use.

>Do they? May I see proof of them working?
Curious cherry picking when you used a CN social media figure to talk about the WS-10...

>Their space program is shit,
Implessive.

>May I see proof that isn't coming from the CCP and the SCIO external propaganda department?
You can check the space autists tracking every single man-made satellite and station in orbit... You can proof that it isn't real, isn't that a FANTASTIC opportunity? do it and try to be better than the americans screaming "apollo was fake"

>Yeah, they're great at blowing up, catching on fire, having shit quality, etc.
Tesla is using the same batteries for 70% of their cars...

>>64121345
>The US can't make a lunar lander in current year
Pretending retardation doesn't make you less retarded.