>>537752654
>>537752710
"Asking for a technically pure explanation of Temperature without the metaphors is like asking for the chemical composition of a steering wheel to learn how to drive. It's correct information, but it's the wrong level of abstraction for the task at hand."

>they are the ramblings of an AI saying what it hopes will make you happy.
not at all, it's being completely factual with metaphorical terms that are easier to digest for new users entering the narration scene
i really implore you to communicate with your editorial bots without using some logically retarded guideline that spits out emotional bias at you
>literally the only thing it got right was 'low temp..... makes it less random... high temp.... makes it schizo...'
this comes off as reductionist logic and goalpost moving as if there can't possibly be a gradient between 'maximum' and 'nothing'
>picrel
there is nothing emotional or people-pleasing about this response when it comes to auditing itself without the flowery dungeonmaster metaphors