>>106228795
>weird, what resolution are u genning at?
Kinda depends on the image. 640x480, 832x480, 512x512 (swap em for vertical). 81 frames, interpolating final to 24. I've got 64gb of ddr4 as well. I'm using the lightx2v workflow from the rentry, and it looks like that one is set to 6 steps?

If the GGUF isn't offering much though I'll skip it.
I'll be honest, I'm not even sure what would count as "quality" anymore either, aside from the occasional mushy face, it's all starting to become subjective.

Really, the longest part seems like the text encoding. That can take anywhere from 115s if I change it, to 20s if I leave it. Which seems to be how it's "supposed" to work (in that it caches nodes apparently), but I feel like text encoding could probably be faster somewhere.
What do you have your swap set to?