>>519115546
>If they are eager to discard you so easily, then don't waste your time trying to win them back.
This, unfortunately. But it's hard, when you really do love them. It's hard to understand how they can treat that so lightly and not even appreciate it, despite probably being depressed, broke, miserable, bad family relations, suicidal even (most of my friends were).
At this point, I've fully committed to the belief that demons are real and can strongly influence people's decision making.

>>515344085
They are shooting at the centre.

>>513258108
Thats not very low empathy conservative of you anon. What are ya? Some kinda gay liberal tranny that can empathize with other humans?

>>512455767
>If you feel sorry for him you are sub human filth.

nay nigga nay nigga nigga nay nigga
nay nigga nay nigga nigga nay nigga

His latest interview is not going down well on xitter maga crowd. To say the least. No one is buying Epstein files are a Russia Russia Russia hoax created by Comey, Obama and Biden. Why in the fuck would Democrats create a hoax in which 99% of the people implicated are Democrats. 99% Democrats and Trump are implicated.

Can anyone even translate what the hell he is trying to say? If some of the material was removed by Democrats and is missing, that does not mean Epstein files are a Russia hoax. Russia hoax is a concept Trump uses to DEFEND HIMSELF. Why the fuck is his reflex to defend himself when Epstein is brought up?

This shit will flush him down the bog. This is historical madness.

I like libertarianism because then actions have organic consequences. In a libertarian state, people would have lots of guns and you wouldn't want to commit crime for fear of being shot. (organic prevention of crime).

How come no one ever talks about how the you can't really trust any sources? And if you can't trust sources, then information is subjective. I think it's pretty obvious that the higher the stakes, the more incentive to fake information. So politics and religion are the 2 highest stakes things in the world and it seems to me that none of the information surrounding research can be trusted.

Anything you or I believe is but a mishmash of subjective opinions, biased studies, biased research, and confirmation bias. Anyone who says otherwise is not being intellectually honest.

>no, erm, actually, my information is correct, and yours if wrong.

sure little buddy.

I'm a right-wing chud btw. I'm not an "enlightened centrist" trying to convert you to centrism. I'm trying to say that opinions and facts are a funny thing. And everyone thinks they are correct.

>>509324608
Happy? Because they aren't dour shitlibs like you, Kenneth. Do yourself a solid, KYS.