>>513042049
lol. another flat earther that cant into how cameras work. sad. in reality the size of the sun and moon doesn't change hardly at all, and certainly not anything like it would if it was actually getting lots closer and then farther away from you.

>>513042049
lol. another flat earther that cant into how cameras work. sad. in reality the size of the sun and moon doesn't change hardly at all, and certainly not anything like it would if it was actually getting lots closer and then farther away from you.

>>29259888
What now flatgot?

>>23076061
the distance between the earth and the moon always varies. and then there always the question of how your 255km was measured. where does this come from? And, even gievn its true, what does that mean for your flat earth idea?
it should vary a great deal more that that if the earth was flat, just like the size of the sun and moon would vary massively every single day..but it doesn't.

>>512293044
no. its because the light is coming from the sun when its close to the horizon, something which wouldn't really happen in your dumb flat earth models.

the size of the sun would also vary a lot. which is doesn't.

https://atoptics.co.uk/blog/mountain-shadows/

>>23057258
no. its because the light is coming from the sun when its close to the horizon, something which wouldn't really happen in your dumb flat earth models.

the size of the sun would also vary a lot. which is doesn't.

https://atoptics.co.uk/blog/mountain-shadows/

>>511981461
feel free to play with the values of sun altitude etc

>>22994490
>will hide behind mountains when it's far enough.
it would also change size and apparent rate of motion as it got closer to you then went farther away. it doesn't do that.

>>509703829
but the sun stays the same size all day see >>509703000
read it, understand it, you are debunked

but you know its round
you're a shill pretending to be retarded for a well poisoning psyop