>>513739959
Pic related
>>513740287
You seem new. There are always leaks of unredacted versions which would make the rounds online, especially here. /pol/ lacks the influence it once had but it's still enough to warrant glowniggers and other surveillance for a reason. A little probing of what little wasn't redacted on the official release (which would look like pic related) would have caused so much lying and back pedaling by that sheboon press secretary that there would be no way to hide the truth.