>came 2nd in Cancer Cup with a really good time
>had to watch other anons post their 1st place times that were far worse than mine
>came 1st in Leo Cup with a meh time
>get to watch other anons post their losses with times far better than mine
Fufufuuuuu~. The scales of justice balance in the end
4chan Search
13 results for "29a66e3c65ba1b4136a40710ccf9753d"
>>12533038
keep on noodlin
keep on noodlin
how horrifying
>>3145
>>3147
THIS
I'm not gonna stop deleting them. The vast majority of /vp/ and /vr/ doesn't want these threads. Saying it should be allowed because some people think it's 'fun' is a retarded reason. Many more people also think dubs threads are 'fun'.
Spamming the same stream thread across 4chan IS NOT ALLOWED. Period
P.S.: Here are some quotes from moot to remind the rest of you of what your job is:
http://archive.foolz.us/q/search/text/cup/capcode/admin/
>Moot instead of jumping to insane conclusions about the cup,
>How is "reposting stream threads ad nauseum across multiple boards" an "insane conclusion"? It's advertising—period.
>2nd question: Will we be able to make 4chan cup threads again anytime soon?
>Will you be able to advertise across multiple boards? No.
>Moot, can you suggest a way the 4chan Cup might retain its tie to 4chan and continue to operate?
>It can exist and go on all it wants -- it just can't be spammed across the site as it has been in the past.
>Fuck, really? I thought you were alright with the 4chan Cup. I mean, it's a staple.
>It gets spammed across all of the boards which counts as advertising. We don't allow stream threads generally and this is the same exact thing.
>Moot, are 4chan Cup threads ban-worthy?
>We consider them to be advertising, which is against the rules.
>I've already made it clear in the past that there is to be a single thread on /vg/ about the cup.
>You can also maintain a single thread on /sp/.
>If you spam the other boards, we'll permaban you. Stop thinking the rules don't apply to you and grow up/stop shitting up the boards for others who don't care. Tall order for 4channers, I know.
Now, how about we keep janitoring consistent by only allowing cup threads on /sp/ and /vg/? Is that too hard?
>>3147
THIS
I'm not gonna stop deleting them. The vast majority of /vp/ and /vr/ doesn't want these threads. Saying it should be allowed because some people think it's 'fun' is a retarded reason. Many more people also think dubs threads are 'fun'.
Spamming the same stream thread across 4chan IS NOT ALLOWED. Period
P.S.: Here are some quotes from moot to remind the rest of you of what your job is:
http://archive.foolz.us/q/search/text/cup/capcode/admin/
>Moot instead of jumping to insane conclusions about the cup,
>How is "reposting stream threads ad nauseum across multiple boards" an "insane conclusion"? It's advertising—period.
>2nd question: Will we be able to make 4chan cup threads again anytime soon?
>Will you be able to advertise across multiple boards? No.
>Moot, can you suggest a way the 4chan Cup might retain its tie to 4chan and continue to operate?
>It can exist and go on all it wants -- it just can't be spammed across the site as it has been in the past.
>Fuck, really? I thought you were alright with the 4chan Cup. I mean, it's a staple.
>It gets spammed across all of the boards which counts as advertising. We don't allow stream threads generally and this is the same exact thing.
>Moot, are 4chan Cup threads ban-worthy?
>We consider them to be advertising, which is against the rules.
>I've already made it clear in the past that there is to be a single thread on /vg/ about the cup.
>You can also maintain a single thread on /sp/.
>If you spam the other boards, we'll permaban you. Stop thinking the rules don't apply to you and grow up/stop shitting up the boards for others who don't care. Tall order for 4channers, I know.
Now, how about we keep janitoring consistent by only allowing cup threads on /sp/ and /vg/? Is that too hard?